Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
Cases that cite this one
153 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Ruby Clavelle v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- Clavelle v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- Watson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- Williams v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
- Paramore v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
- Buckley v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- Flowers v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Thomas v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Stephens v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Moultrie v. Dixon (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Cupp v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
- Littleton v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
- Wainwright v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
- Keith Patrick Henry v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Jermaine Lee Walker v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Clarence Perkins Jr. v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Akins v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Akins v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Rambo v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Rambo v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Henry v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Henry v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Powell v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Powell v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- Harold Long v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Thomas A. MUNN, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Thomas A. Munn, pro se, petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Thomas A. Munn petitions this court for mandamus relief in the form of an order directing the circuit court to rule on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pending in that forum. In light of the circuit court's recent issuance of an order to show cause why the petition pending below should not be granted, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted.[1] We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim before it.
KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Munn's request that we permit the amendment of this proceeding to undertake certiorari review of the circuit court's order to show cause is denied based on our conclusion that the prerequisites for certiorari review are not present. See generally, Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 1987).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.