Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Gurney v. Gurney

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 18, 2002 · Griffin, Peterson, Pleus

804 So. 2d 601; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 285; 2002 WL 63194 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Valentine v. Van Sickle (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Several issues were raised, but, with one exception, we affirm.1 Appellee acknowledges there is no record basis for inclusion of appellant’s per diem pay as income. We reject appel-lee’s argument that the error is de minim-is. Accordingly, we remand to the lower court for recalculation of child support and alimony using the correct income figure.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.