Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Mirelez v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 25, 2002 · Griffin, Peterson, Pleus

804 So. 2d 622; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 561; 2002 WL 90821 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rosenberg v. Morales (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction but remand to the trial court to correct an inconsistency between the orally pronounced sentence and the written sentence as to Count XIV. The trial court orally pronounced a five year sentence while the written sentence imposed a prison term of 15 years for this count. The error is clear and its correction does not change the aggregate sentence appellant received.

Therefore, the appellant’s conviction is affirmed and the matter is remanded for correction of the sentence as to Count XIV.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.