Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek

Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 16, 2002 · Farmer, Gross, Warner
805 So. 2d 71; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 227; 2002 WL 54631 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of dissolution. The wife complains about the amount of alimony and the trial court’s failure to award attorney’s fees. Neither is an abuse of discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980). In particular, as to the attorney’s fees, the attorney had received a significant temporary award of fees, and the wife *72actually received more than the husband in equitable distribution.

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.