Riggens v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Riggens v. State, 805 So. 2d 1082 (2002)
2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 955; 2002 WL 125618
Peterson, Pleus, Thompson

Riggens v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 788 So.2d 223, 227 (Fla. 2001) (“[Hjabeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial”) (quoting Parker v. Dugger, 550 So.2d 459, 460 (Fla. 1989)).

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harold RIGGENS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published