Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Sanchez v. State

Sanchez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 16, 2002 · Gunther, Hazouri, Taylor
806 So. 2d 564; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 224; 2002 WL 54597 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sanchez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As we did in Stretcher v. State, 01-2943 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑