Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Dockery v. State

Dockery v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 30, 2002 · Gunther, Polen, Shahood
807 So. 2d 145; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 716; 2002 WL 113550 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dockery v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis, and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla. 2001):

*146WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCING ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

See also Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec. 19, 2001).

POLEN, C.J., GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑