Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Doyle v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 13, 2002 · Klein, Stevenson, Warner

807 So. 2d 173; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1388; 2002 WL 215354 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Katz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE' DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

WARNER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.