Doyle v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Doyle v. State, 807 So. 2d 173 (2002)
2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1388; 2002 WL 215354
Klein, Stevenson, Warner

Doyle v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE' DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

WARNER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gary Andrew DOYLE v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published