Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

R.D.A. v. State

R.D.A. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 13, 2002 · Fletcher, Nesbitt, Ramirez
807 So. 2d 175; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1400; 2002 WL 216424 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

R.D.A. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the record reveals that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that R.D.A. committed trespass after warning, we reverse the judgment and sentence of guilt. See L.D.L. v. State, 569 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)(state has the burden *176of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the offense of trespass).

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.