Shinka v. State
Shinka v. State
807 So. 2d 764; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1676; 2002 WL 226176
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Shinka v. State
Opinion of the Court
Jeffrey L. Shinka appeals the summary denial of his motion for jail time credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Shinka alleged that he has not received the credit to which he was entitled. The trial court denied the claim, noting that Shinka failed to provide any details as to what credit was being denied him. We affirm the trial court’s order because Shinka’s motion is facially insufficient. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998); Flanagan v. State, 792 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Shinka’s right to file a facially sufficient motion.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.