Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Booker v. State

Booker v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 26, 2002 · Barfield, Ervin, Lewis
807 So. 2d 800; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2011; 2002 WL 265867 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Booker v. State

Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, J.

Because appellant was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se motion, it was a nullity. See Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Beverly v. State, 516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). See also, Jackson v. State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Fla. 2000); Burke v. State, 732 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The trial court therefore properly dismissed the motion.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.