Davich v. Norman Bros. Nissan
Davich v. Norman Bros. Nissan
807 So. 2d 825; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2193; 2002 WL 312779
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Davich v. Norman Bros. Nissan
Opinion of the Court
DENIED.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially.
I do not understand the application of “law of the case” doctrine to a discovery ruling that was not made the subject of certiorari review. Nor do I understand its application to an issue upon which this court did not rule. Florida Dep’t of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So.2d 101 (Fla. 2001).
I do agree, however, that a writ of mandamus is not warranted. If there is an appeal, we can decide at that time whether the lower court’s refusal to allow discovery of damage to 1992 model year vehicles constitutes reversible error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.