Camero v. State
Camero v. State
810 So. 2d 559; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269; 2002 WL 341057
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Camero v. State
Opinion of the Court
Having considered the petitioner’s response to this Court’s order of January 22, 2002, we treat the notice of appeal as invoking our certiorari jurisdiction and deny the state’s motion to dismiss. We further grant the petitioner’s request to treat his brief as a petition for a writ of certiorari, and deny the motion to compel the state to answer.
Finding no violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice, we deny the writ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.