Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Washington v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 6, 2002 · Gross, Hazouri, Shahood

810 So. 2d 972; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2925; 2002 WL 180878 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Duhart (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEPENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

SHAHOOD, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.