Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Hoyt v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 27, 2002 · Farmer, Klein, Warner

810 So. 2d 1007; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2066; 2002 WL 271193 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pridgen v. First Union Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this appeal of an order denying appellant’s objections to a foreclosure sale. The first three issues appellant raises relate to a hearing before the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board which took place in May, 1991, resulting in a fine and a lien. Those alleged errors had to be appealed in 1991 to the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity. See § 162.11, Fla. Stat. (2001). An appeal now is untimely. The remaining issue was determined in an earlier final judgment of fore*1008closure which appellant appealed, but the appeal was dismissed because he did not pursue it. We can only review the order denying appellant’s objection to the foreclosure sale and find no error. We accordingly affirm.

WARNER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.