Smilack v. Slizyk
Smilack v. Slizyk
812 So. 2d 591; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4279; 2002 WL 491948
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smilack v. Slizyk
Opinion of the Court
We reverse an order denying the appointment of a receiver. Appellant, the holder of a mortgage which is in default, established that the rents and profits are part of the security for the mortgage and that the appellee mortgagor is receiving rents and profits but is failing to apply them to the mortgage debt. In addition, the appellee mortgagor is insolvent. We therefore reverse for the appointment of a receiver. Carolina Portland Cement Co.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.