Valenzuela v. State
Valenzuela v. State
813 So. 2d 962; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1339; 2002 WL 192326
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Valenzuela v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. The appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) does not affirmatively allege that a prior offense essential to categorize him as a habitual offender does not exist, see Judge v. State,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.