Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Van Poyck v. State

Van Poyck v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 8, 2002 · Jorgenson, Nesbitt, Shevin
816 So. 2d 208; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6155; 2002 WL 882437 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Van Poyck v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is barred as successive. See, e.g., Walker v. State, 814 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). “The defendant is abusing the judicial process by filing successive motions that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions.” Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑