Carrazana v. State
Carrazana v. State
816 So. 2d 804; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583; 2002 WL 985353
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Carrazana v. State
Opinion of the Court
The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.