Carrazana v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Carrazana v. State, 816 So. 2d 804 (2002)
2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583; 2002 WL 985353
Levy, Ramirez, Sorondo

Carrazana v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Reference

Full Case Name
Ruben CARRAZANA v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published