Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Rojas v. State

Rojas v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 12, 2002 · Gersten, Green, Sorondo
816 So. 2d 1270; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8210; 2002 WL 1284223 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rojas v. State

Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER curiam.

The state correctly concedes that the trial court erred in summarily denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief on the grounds that it was untimely filed. Defendant’s conviction and sentence became final upon this Court’s issuance of a mandate on March 24, 2000. Defendant filed his motion for post-conviction relief on March 6, 2002, within two years of the date of the mandate. Thus, defendant’s motion was timely. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand the case to the trial court to permit the defendant to file an amended motion for post-conviction relief, which is to relate back to the original date of filing.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.