Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc.

George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 5, 2002 · Gross, Shahood
819 So. 2d 233; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8170; 2002 WL 1174387 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee’s renewed motion for directed verdict and entering final judgment. We agree with the trial court that the indemnification agreement did not meet the requirements of section 725.06(2), Florida Statutes (1999), since it did not give a “specific consideration” for the indemnification that was “provided for” in the contract.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑