Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

V.T.Z. v. State

V.T.Z. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 19, 2002 · Cope, Jorgenson, Levy
819 So. 2d 914; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536; 2002 WL 1332529 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

V.T.Z. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals from an adjudication of delinquency on the charges of grand theft and burglary of an unoccupied conveyance.

Based upon the State’s proper and commendable confession of error, we vacate the adjudication and sentence and remand for a new trial. See Murphy v. State, 789 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that where transcript of trial “contains irremediable and substantial omissions and *915obvious and egregious error in the portions which do exist,” new trial is required “in the interest of justice and due process.”).

Vacated and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.