Hauss v. State
Hauss v. State
819 So. 2d 987; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8776; 2002 WL 1370009
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hauss v. State
Opinion of the Court
Robert Hauss, (the Appellant), appeals his sentence imposed as a result of his conviction and adjudication of guilt for multiple counts of D.U.I. The Appellant argues that the written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence.
The State has conceded error in this case. Therefore, we affirm the Appellant’s conviction, but remand to the trial court to enter a written order conforming to the trial judge’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. See Cheshire v. State, 568 So.2d 908, 913 (Fla. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.