Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 10, 2002 · Green, Ramirez, Sorondo
820 So. 2d 1051; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626; 2002 WL 1466259 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rodriguez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As we conclude that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s revocation of the appellant’s probation according to its oral pronouncements, we affirm the same. We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So.2d 136 (Fla. *10523d DCA 1998); Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed as modified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑