Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
823 So. 2d 203; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10298; 2002 WL 1625635
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order denying the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief made pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 where the trial court’s findings were supported by competent substantial evidence. See Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1997). We do, however, remand this cause for amendment of the written sentencing order to reflect that the appellant was sentenced to 120 months as a violent career criminal in accordance with the court’s oral pronouncement.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.