Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Perry v. State

Perry v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 7, 2002 · Gross, Gunther, Stone
824 So. 2d 255; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11269; 2002 WL 1798909 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Perry v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to seek review in a legally sufficient, timely motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Moore v. State, 810 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (citing Hollis v. State, 763 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)) (explaining that a claim that the state did not give the defendant notice of its intent to seek a habitual offender sentence is not renewable under rule 3.800(a)).

GUNTHER, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.