Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Grogin v. State

Grogin v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 21, 2002 · Gross, Hazouri, Klein
824 So. 2d 984; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12012; 2002 WL 1906500 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Grogin v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant filed a rule 3.850 motion alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the sentence he would receive in connection with his open plea. The motion is legally insufficient because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); Roldan v. State, 695 So.2d 864, 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

KLEIN, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.