De Varona v. De Souza
De Varona v. De Souza
824 So. 2d 985; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12027; 2002 WL 1906210
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
De Varona v. De Souza
Opinion of the Court
We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari in part. As the respondent’s counsel commendably concedes, the trial court erred in denying petitioner’s motion to abate the legal malpractice claim. Perez-Abreu, Zamora & De La Fe, P.A. v. Taracido, 790 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 2001). That portion of the order declining to abate count III of respondent’s complaint is hereby quashed and shall be abated o,n remand. This same reasoning, however, does not compel abatement of the fraudulent inducement claim asserted in count IV. The petition is denied as to count IV.
Certiorari granted in part; denied in part and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.