Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Franklin v. State

Franklin v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 12, 2002 · Nortwick, Padovano, Webster
826 So. 2d 456; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191; 2002 WL 31026972 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Franklin v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation listing the conditions of probation violated. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, Van NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.