Walker v. State
Walker v. State
828 So. 2d 501; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15500; 2002 WL 31374839
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Walker v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See, e.g., Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222, 1223-1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that prior sentencing as a youthful offender does not preclude consideration in habitual offender proceeding of such crimes as predicate offenses); Gadsen v. State, 805 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Whitfield v. Singletary, 730 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also Arce v. State, 762 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming the denial of motion to correct sentence under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000) where defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.