Lefils v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Lefils v. State, 831 So. 2d 223 (2002)
2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165; 2002 WL 31356387
Cobb, Griffin, Sharp
Lefils v. State
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. The defendant appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion for additional jail time credit. Athough defendant’s motion (and amended motion) are far from clear, it appears the defendant is seeking jail time credit for time he spent on other separate charges.
When a defendant makes a prima facie claim for jail time credit, the trial court has the burden of attaching portions of the record to refute the claim. See Moore v. State, 741 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Accordingly, I would reverse and remand for attachment of portions of the record to refute the defendant’s claim.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Salem LEFILS v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published