Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Lefils v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 18, 2002 · Cobb, Griffin, Sharp

831 So. 2d 223; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165; 2002 WL 31356387 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

City of Zephyrhills v. Wood (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

SHARP, W., J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The defendant appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion for additional jail time credit. Athough defendant’s motion (and amended motion) are far from clear, it appears the defendant is seeking jail time credit for time he spent on other separate charges.

When a defendant makes a prima facie claim for jail time credit, the trial court has the burden of attaching portions of the record to refute the claim. See Moore v. State, 741 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Accordingly, I would reverse and remand for attachment of portions of the record to refute the defendant’s claim.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. SHARP, W., J., dissents, with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.