Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Pintado v. State

Pintado v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 11, 2002 · Cope, Goderich, Schwartz
831 So. 2d 816; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18116; 2002 WL 31757516 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pintado v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant seeks review of the denial without hearing of a post conviction motion which sought additional credit for time served. Because of the uncertainty in the present record, particularly as to the reason for the defendant’s confinement in Orange County during the period for which the claim is now made, we vacate the order below and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing pursuant to Rule 3.850. Consult Tatum v. State, 811 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(SC02-952, stayed pending review in Gethers v. State, SC01-2639).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.