Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Comesana v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 11, 2002 · Green, Levy, Shevin

831 So. 2d 819; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18118; 2002 WL 31757441 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Comesana (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla. 1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.