Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Moore v. State

Moore v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 6, 2002 · Orfinger, Peterson, Pleus
832 So. 2d 249; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17833; 2002 WL 31729090 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Moore v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Based on defendant’s numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Mr. Moore is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions relating to his conviction and - sentence in trial court case 05-1998-CF-004167-AXXX-XX, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. See Rahymes v. State, 730 So.2d 420, 422 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismissed, 733 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1999); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133, 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also Lockett v. State, 769 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

PETERSON, PLEUS, and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.