Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Loeffler v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 11, 2002 · Silberman, Stringer, Whatley

832 So. 2d 261; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18096; 2002 WL 31757268 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Theoc v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Vance Loeffler challenges the orders of the trial court summarily denying his motions filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). We affirm. Our affirmance of Loeffler’s rule 3.800(a) motion for jail credit is without prejudice to any right Loeffler might have to file a timely, facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion seeking credit against his prison sentence in the present case for time spent in the custody of the Department of Corrections from the date any Highlands County detainer was lodged against him. See Keene v. State, 816 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.