Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Martin v. State

Martin v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 26, 2002 · Cope, Gersten, Shewn
832 So. 2d 943; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19158; 2002 WL 31870572 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Martin v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Troy Martin appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, wherein defendant-appellant Martin asserts newly discovered evidence. The motion fails to set forth what the evidence was in the defendant’s case, and how the *944claimed newly discovered evidence would have affected the outcome, if at all. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to file an amended motion.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.