Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
832 So. 2d 945; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19173; 2002 WL 31870529
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the final order disqualifying the appellant from receiving unemployment benefits where there is substantial, competent record evidence to support the determination that he failed to follow the reasonable instructions of his employer, and was thus discharged for misconduct as defined by section 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2001). See Bozzo v. Safelite Glass Corp., 654 So.2d 1042, 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Brownstein v. Hartwell Enters., Inc., 647 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Rubido v. Brinks, Inc., 601 So.2d 1298, 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.