Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Miller v. State

Miller v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 18, 2002 · Cope, Goderich, Schwartz
840 So. 2d 263; 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18565; 2002 WL 31828764 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Miller v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because, as the state concedes, the trial judge should have excused a particular juror for cause, Chavers v. State, 827 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Polite v. State, 754 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and the defendant properly preserved the error in accordance with Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 876, 118 S.Ct. 197, 139 L.Ed.2d 134 (1997); see Wilson v. State, 753 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 773 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2000), the judgment below is reversed for a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.