Urruchurtu v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Barber v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Cordova v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Wright v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
- Gutierrez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Alberto URRUCHURTU, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Alberto Urruchurtu, in proper person.
*388 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, SHEVIN, and WELLS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed. See § 893.135(1)(j), Fla. Stat. (2000). The defendant was charged with, and ultimately convicted of and sentenced for, a crime that he committed on June 20, 2001. That crime and the minimum mandatory sentence that it carried, were first created by chapter 2000-320, section 4, Laws of Florida, page 3497 and became effective October 1, 2000. This amendment was not part of chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida but added entirely new provisions to section 893.135 and thus was not affected by any infirmity in chapter 99-188, by the decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), or by enactment of chapter 2002-212, Laws of Florida.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.