Barber v. State
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Schrack v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Titus BARBER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Fisher, Lawrence & Malove, and Andrew M. Teschner, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FLETCHER, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Titus Barber appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion in which he raises four instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. However, in its order denying the motion, the trial court only addressed three issues. We therefore remand so that the trial court may address Barber's fourth issue, ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to request a jury instruction pertaining to guilty knowledge of the controlled substance. See Currelly v. State, 801 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hurley v. State, 779 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (trial court orders which do not address all of the claims for post-conviction relief will be remanded for entry of an order which does).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.