Ey v. State
Ey v. State
870 So. 2d 64; 2003 WL 22515603
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ey v. State (Fla. 2008)
- Bates v. State (Fla. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Robert EY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*65 PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); McGee v. State, 684 So.2d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). As this court did in Alexander, 830 So.2d at 899-90, we certify the same question of great public importance, to wit:
WHETHER ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ON THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT'S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN OTHERWISE FACIALLY SUFFICIENT MOTION ARE COGNIZABLE AS AN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM.
Affirmed; question certified.
FULMER, KELLY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.