Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Sheppard v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 15, 2003 · Fletcher, Gersten, Goderich

834 So. 2d 390; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 229; 2003 WL 124318 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Sheppard v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Kitt v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Clifton Deon Sheppard appeals from final judgments of conviction and entry of sentences. We affirm.

Although we deplore the prosecutorial misconduct evident in this case,1 the defendant elected to make no contemporaneous objections. The unobjected-to comments complained of do not rise to the level of fundamental error; they did not destroy the essential fairness of the trial. See Rogers v. State, 783 So.2d 980, 1002 (Fla. 2001); Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla. 1996); Scoggins v. State, 691 So.2d 1185, 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(“Funda-mental error has been defined as one that goes to the essence of a fair and impartial trial, error so fundamentally unfair as to amount to a denial of due process.”).

Affirmed.

. See Guerra v. State, 813 So.2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Rodriguez v. State, 794 So.2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(Ramirez, J., concurring).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.