Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Matisko v. Matisko

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 17, 2003 · Griffin, Orfinger, Sharp

834 So. 2d 405; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289; 2003 WL 131628 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Reed v. Reed (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted.

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.