Matisko v. Matisko

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Matisko v. Matisko, 834 So. 2d 405 (2003)
2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 289; 2003 WL 131628
Griffin, Orfinger, Sharp

Matisko v. Matisko

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted.

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert J. MATISKO v. Wanda E. MATISKO
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published