Harris v. State
Harris v. State
834 So. 2d 908; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 98; 2003 WL 57017
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Harris v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 that satisfies the requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998) and Thomas v. State, 712 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). See Andujar v. State, 808 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.