Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 15, 2003 · Fletcher, Gersten, Green
835 So. 2d 1211; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 220; 2003 WL 118496 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant’s amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.