Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Lee v. State

Lee v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 12, 2003 · Goderich, Jorgenson, Shevin
836 So. 2d 1127; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1390; 2003 WL 289429 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lee v. State

Opinion of the Court

*1128ON MOTION FOR REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

The opinion filed November 6, 2002, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Contrary to the trial court’s conclusion, the motion is timely pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1999). However, the trial court correctly denied the motion on the merits, as defendant faile'd to establish prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Moreover, the record establishes that there was a factual basis for defendant’s plea, and that defendant, through counsel, stipulated to that factual basis.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.