Katwaroo v. State
Katwaroo v. State
837 So. 2d 612; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1936; 2003 WL 366123
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Katwaroo v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court’s order dismissing defendant’s rule 3.850 motion is affirmed without prejudice to defendant filing a timely motion with either a sworn oath or a declaration. See, e.g., Creel v. State, 769 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming summary denial of postconviction motion that failed to include a proper oath; affirmance
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.