Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Pohl v. State

Pohl v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 19, 2003 · Gross, Stone
837 So. 2d 1123; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793; 2003 WL 354945 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pohl v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant’s conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant’s contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.