Pohl v. State
Pohl v. State
837 So. 2d 1123; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793; 2003 WL 354945
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pohl v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant’s conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant’s contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.