Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

Tweed v. Coleman

Tweed v. Coleman
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 6, 2003 · Barfield, Hawkes, Polston
838 So. 2d 1204; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235; 2003 WL 253042 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tweed v. Coleman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated November 15, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order Dismissing Case in Part and Order to Show Cause, dated September 23, 2002, is neither a final appealable order nor an appealable partial final order where an interrelated claim for mandamus is pending below. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99-100 (Fla. 1974); Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k), (m). The appellant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Appeal, filed January 6, 2003, is denied.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.