N.S. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
N.S. v. State, 838 So. 2d 1209 (2003)
2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560; 2003 WL 728379
Casanueva, Stringer, Whatley

N.S. v. State

Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm N.S.’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a structure and petit theft; however, we remand for correction of the disposition order.

The State filed a petition for delinquency charging N.S. with burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As part of a plea agreement with the State, N.S. pleaded no contest to reduced charges of burglary of a structure and petit theft. The trial court accepted N.S.’s plea to the reduced charges; however, the disposition order incorrectly states that N.S. pleaded no contest to the original charges. On remand, the trial court must enter a corrected disposition order that accurately reflects the crimes to which N.S. pleaded.

Affirmed but remanded for correction of the disposition order.

WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
N.S. v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published