Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2003

N.S. v. State

N.S. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 5, 2003 · Casanueva, Stringer, Whatley
838 So. 2d 1209; 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560; 2003 WL 728379 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

N.S. v. State

Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm N.S.’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a structure and petit theft; however, we remand for correction of the disposition order.

The State filed a petition for delinquency charging N.S. with burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As part of a plea agreement with the State, N.S. pleaded no contest to reduced charges of burglary of a structure and petit theft. The trial court accepted N.S.’s plea to the reduced charges; however, the disposition order incorrectly states that N.S. pleaded no contest to the original charges. On remand, the trial court must enter a corrected disposition order that accurately reflects the crimes to which N.S. pleaded.

Affirmed but remanded for correction of the disposition order.

WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.